By James H. Hall
Nine 1/4" x 6" - with 237 pgs. Philosophical difficulties in faith is a center e-book for introductory classes in philosophy of faith. The booklet discusses and illustrates the philosophical concerns concerned, and emphasizes universal non secular reports instead of esoteric or speculative theology.
Read or Download Knowledge, Belief and Transcendence PDF
Best religious books
Walter Kaufmann dedicated his existence to exploring the non secular implications ol literary and philosophical texts. Deeply skeptical in regards to the human and ethical bene? ts of recent secularism, he additionally criticized the search for sure bet pursued via dogma. Kaufmann observed a chance of lack of authenticity in what he defined as unjusti?
The Seductions of Pilgrimage explores the concurrently beautiful and repellent, beguiling and welcoming kinds of seduction in pilgrimage. It specializes in the numerous discursive, creative, and sensible mechanisms of seduction that draw person pilgrims to a pilgrimage website; the items, locations, and paradigms that pilgrims depart in the back of as they embark on their hyper-meaningful shuttle event; and the customarily unexpected parts that lead pilgrims off their wanted path.
- Spinoza's Radical Cartesian Mind
- Story of Alchemy and the Beginnings of Chemistry
- Foucault and Religion: Spiritual Corporality and Political Spirituality
- An Atheist's History of Belief: Understanding Our Most Extraordinary Invention
Additional resources for Knowledge, Belief and Transcendence
The other reason why I hesitate to excuse revelations from meeting the standard canons of evidence is simply that I do not see any compelling reason to think that they are different in any relevant way from the sorts of data, information, and evidence that we have already been talking about. After all, revelations come in relatively straightforward ways: a message in the sky or a voice in the night. The person receiving the revelation reaches some inference through the exercise of his mind. That is to say, he has an experience of a certain sort, and he exercises his reason on it in a certain pattern.
Some of the greatest difficulties are with the criterion of relative unambiguity. Revelations (or supposed ones) of the sort I have read about tend to be subject to considerable and flexible interpretation. It has not been very difficult through the years for those who have received "revelations" to have confidence about their precise content and force. But, unless and until some kind of unambiguous and forceful interpretation can be placed upon a "revelation" at a public level, then that "revelation" cannot stand as evidence in support of any specific claims to know for the population at large.
F. : Prentice-Hall, 1963), now deplorably out of print. (Also, see below pp. 58-9) On Knowing 27 Publicness Effective evidence must be open, in principle, to public confirmation. Repeatability (or publicness) is just about basic for scientific inquiry. A scientist who, when asked for evidence to back up a claim, asserted that the only possible evidence is available exclusively to him, would be in very bad straits. We would not be inclined to give him any credence at all. You may remember that several years ago a Dr.
Knowledge, Belief and Transcendence by James H. Hall